BRATO
BR's automatic train operation system (BRATO), which used the
ex-Scottish Region 2-car battery railcar (re-numbered RDB 975003/4 and named Lab
16
Gemini) as its test vehicle, was extensively tested at the Mickleover test
track between 1968 and 1975. Known as the 'wiggly wire' system this was the forerunner of what was developed by many other companies into what is now known as Automatic Train
Operation (ATO) and Automatic Train Protection (ATP).
The original wiggly-wire was laid on the Down line between Friargate and Etwall stations - a distance of approx. six and a half miles. A contemporary note taken from Alastair Gilchrist's 'A History of British Railway's Electrical Research' 'Following the 1967 move from Rugby to Derby a new and improved 'wiggly wire' test site was established close to Derby. Some 6½ miles of the Derby Friargate to Egginton Junction freight line were equipped with track conductors, plus a new feature: "telegram coils" transmitting fixed data. Imitation colour light signals were installed to simulate main line practice. (The freight traffic, soon to be withdrawn; responded to semaphores.) A Control Room was established at Friargate. transmitting and receiving equipment was designed and procured, whilst the locomotive computer and driver's display were built in-house. A simulator was also built to exercise the locomotive equipment. Finally, a battery railcar was commissioned to act as "locomotive", By the spring of 1968 much of this equipment was in operation and confidence in the feasibility of signalling - even controlling - trains by these means was very high.' |
A trial system laid in the yard
at the RTC pictured on March 10th 1965, with RDB999507 the
Elliott track recording car
in the background. The wire was bonded to plastic sheets fixed to the ground. Author's collection |
![]() |
The trackside equipment was
positioned in the S&T location cabinets alongside the line - which at this
stage was still open to traffic. There was a tone generator linked to the
signal which altered depending upon the aspect. This is outside one of the buildings opposite Slack Lane loco shed at the Friargate end of the line Author's collection |
|
![]() |
The remains of Friargate station
showing the 'wiggly wire' in the 4 foot and Portakabins housing the Control
Room and associated equipment on the platforms
- September 1968 RCTS |
![]() |
Here's a close up of the system
installed on a short length of track circa 1967. The wire here is stapled to
plywood boards fixed to the sleepers Author's collection |
The unique
battery railcar Gemini
(Lab 16 RDB975003 and RDB975004) was used exclusively by the Train Control
Group and is shown
just west of the Mickleover depot site heading towards Egginton Jcn,
sometime in the late 1970s. It was originally BR Sc79998 and Sc79999 and was used on the Aberdeen to Ballater branch where it began its working life in 1958 and was acquired by the R&DD in 1966. It is now at the Deeside Railway where its restoration is being completed having been originally undertaken on the East Lancs Railway. For more information look on the Deeside Railway site. Author's collection |
|||
First day of operation of the
battery railcar at Ballater in 1958 complete with pipers BR official |
![]() |
Here is Test Coach 'Mercury' RDB975280 in the formation of a scheduled passenger train on the WCML around 1974 in connection with monitoring of the C-APT system of beacons This was also used for BRATO work and belonged to the Train Control Group and was based at Mickleover BR official |
|
This is the locomotive simulator
and driver's cab display (right) under test in the lab. Author's collection |
|||
A view of the BRATO
cab equipment with driver's display showing the 'distance to target'
indication. The location is at the top of the
climb past the present Mackworth Estate and the bridge in the distance is
one the author used to play on as a child! (and the sun's shining!) Author's collection |
|||
Driving trailer Test Coach
'Hermes' RDB975081 was used with the Clayton locomotive in BRATO
testing. Seen here at Glasgow Works on 3rd June 1978 P Searle |
![]() |
And a technician adjusts the underframe receiving equipment
Author's collection |
|
Derby Lightweight
battery
railcar Gemini
passing Dennis Wheaton the head platelayer at Etwall. Taken near Sutton
Lane Etwall in 1970 Gerald Anthony |
![]() |
A nice colour shot of the 2-car
set Gemini at Bury on the ELR on 5th October 1991 during its
restoration
Simeon Gaskell
|
A contemporary account of the future of BRATO
The Train Control Projects Group of the R & DD had been pursuing various
projects allied to train control since 1967. One of these has been the
computer based speed supervisory system, the driver aid based on data
related to civil engineering and signalling speed limits. A second
project has been the automatic control of a battery electric multiple
unit RDB975003/4 with a view to gaining an appreciation of the problems associated with automatic train operation. (ATO). These two projects, each successful in their own right, have been amalgamated to form the basis of a consolidated train control package for B.R. known as BRATO. The BRATO package was accepted in principle on 19 Nov 75 by the Train Control Steering Group (Minute 75/23).1.2. The BRATO Package
The nature of the original package and a suggested development programme
for the BRATO pilot scheme were
Automatic train operation (a) Safety System, a watchdog for the full BRATO package. (b) Regulatory System for implementing desired speed profiles (DSP). (c) Autodriver System.
The Autodriver The function of the Autodriver will be to manipulate
automatically the traction and braking controls in order to achieve the
degree of train performance requested by the DSP providing that this
accords with safe operation as judged by the Safety System. The
operation of the computer based Autodriver will be dictated by its
operational specification and implemented by specific control principles
or algorithms written into its computer program. The form of these
algorithms and the manner in which they exercise control are governed by
two factors. Firstly, the form of the algorithms must be tailored
to suit the characteristic performance of the train as a whole and those
technical features of the traction and braking equipment which are to be
automatically controlled.
The Class 304 units have been in service since 1958 and during this time
a number of various train performance tests have been conducted.
However, these have mostly been investigations into the behaviour of
composition brake blocks |
Amazing! Unfortunately for reasons unknown none of this came to
fruition.